A Letter from the Editor
By Stephen Phillips
Dear Readers,
I made a mistake. Last week's article entitled “New event for Beijing Olympics: rioting” caused more controversy than I would have ever imagined. First, I managed to grossly mislabel the article as news instead of opinion, so its placement in the print copy of our paper was misleading.
Additionally, a blatant factual error slipped by in editing, stating that the 2000 Olympics were held in Atlanta, Ga. when in fact they were held in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
The piece was meant as an opinion column, part of a future running of semi-regular political articles by Robert Lay, and – at the risk of sounding like a PR bot – the writer's opinions do not reflect the views of Tiger Weekly and the rest of its staff.
It has never been in my management practices to purposely incite anger or controversy in our paper, given that Tiger Weekly's primary editorial goal has always been to offer light-hearted local news and entertainment – and that has served us well, reserving our moments of seriousness for occurrences such as these.
However, the mistake was not in printing the article, but rather the incorrect labeling of it. As everyone should be, Tiger Weekly readers and writers are free to express their opinions within these pages and will continue to do so for as long as this paper exists and the First Amendment remains.
According to the comments and e-mails regarding the article, some readers have advocated stealing copies of this week’s issue or participating in other forms of harmful protest. To us, this is the type of intimidation used against the press in many foreign countries, notably Russia and China. In America, we value dissent and the virtually unrestrained ability of citizens (and guests) in this country to do the same.
As always, any member of the Tiger Weekly staff was (and still is) free to provide a counterpoint to Robert Lay's article, whether that staffer is a copy editor, a sports writer, a marketing intern or otherwise. Additionally, our readers have always graciously exercised those same rights. We're all proud to have that freedom regardless of any appointed positions we hold.
On behalf of Tiger Weekly, I sincerely apologize to any reader who was offended by the article. It's never our intention to offend, but rather embrace our rights as members of the free press.
Below are three reader comments extracted from our Web site, www.tigerweekly.com. While we aren't able to print all of them (There were more than 150 responses), we read them all and encourage you to continue commenting on the article in question and any future articles if you feel so inclined. Embrace your freedom let us know how we're doing.
Sincerely,
Stephen Phillips
Tiger Weekly Editor-in-Chief
Originally Published: Issue 604 - April 16, 2008
| Share on Facebook |



