Sign-In

STORY

Share

Smokers, non-smokers debate new laws

[5 Comment(s)]

By Jonathan Specht

As anti-smoking legislation continues to spread across the United States, new proposals are being met with mixed reactions by smokers and non-smokers. While many non-smokers, who assert their right to choose not to be near secondhand smoke, applaud the moves, some smokers are feeling marginalized and say they should be left alone.

“Smoking or Non-Smoking” is a question heard in fewer and fewer restaurants in the United States. Twenty states banned smoking in restaurants in the past two years alone, and few states remain which have no regulations whatsoever. The most recent state to join the national movement was Iowa, which banned smoking in restaurants on April 15.

One recent legislative move that has received national attention was New York states’ increase in the cigarette tax by $1.25 per pack. New York’s tax, at $2.75 per pack, is now the highest in the nation, and with local taxes the price of a pack of cigarettes in New York City is near $9.

Another proposal attracting a great deal of attention was a bill proposed in the Louisiana state legislature by Representative Walker Hines, a Democrat of New Orleans, to raise the state’s smoking age from 18 to 21.

Brooke Stewart, a sophomore kinesiology major, said that what she learned in her kinesiology classes made her more inclined to support anti-smoking efforts.

“We just learned in class today that smoking one pack of cigarettes puts as much stress on your heart as fifty to seventy five extra pounds,” said Stewart. “I’ve always heard that cigarettes can give you cancer, but I’ve learned so many things in my kinesiology classes that just shock me.”

She said, however, that she wasn’t sure what approach state authorities should take towards the issue.

“Maybe more awareness programs about all the problems smoking causes should be created,” said Stewart.

Dana Clay, a medical student and LSU alumna, said that she could see both sides of the issue.

“As a medical student, I know about the dangers of smoking, and I support programs that encourage people to quit smoking or to not start in the first place. That’s what stricter laws do, or at least try to do,” said Clay. “On the other hand, this is America. I generally believe that people should have freedom of choice, even for some things that are harmful to their own bodies, like smoking.”

Margaret McInnis, who is taking a semester off from LSU, said that she paid $10 for a pack of cigarettes on a visit to New York.

“The prejudice against smokers is outrageous,” said McInnis with exasperation. “They treat us like second-class citizens, lepers even.”

“It’s a ham-fisted attempt at shaping human behavior,” continued McInnis. “It would be much more straight-forward of them to simply ban smoking. Of course, that would never work, and there would be angry mobs everywhere.”

Occasional smoker Alex Meyer said that he disagreed with the Louisiana proposal to raise the smoking age.

“Eighteen is a fine age for the law to be kept at,” said Meyer. “At 18, you’re old enough to decide your own path in life. The idea of raising the smoking age to 21 is ridiculous.”

 

Send your comments to editor@tigerweekly.com

Originally Published: Issue 605 - April 23, 2008

Share on Facebook
Back to the top

Comments

  1. Its worth noting that smoking or non smoking is still heard at many Louisianna resaurants, at least the ones with bars. Anyway I think it rediculous to raise the age to 21 and it is rediculous to tell bar and restaurant owners that they can’t allow smoking on they’re own private property. This whole thing is going too far and we are coming closer and closer to prohibition.

    Frank | 2008-04-23 - 05:49:40 PM (CDT)
  2. Frank touches on perhaps the most overlooked issue in the incessant debate between smokers and nonsmokers - the business owner’s decision on how to operate their private property.

    While nonsmokers do have a right not to be around smoke, they are not ’asserting’ their ’choice’ as the article erroneously states, They are not choosing to visit an already non smoking establishment, instead they are using coercion and the State’s monopoly on violence to force business owners to alter the original direction of their businesses.

    Tre’ | 2008-04-25 - 02:25:22 PM (CDT)
  3. There isn’t a person alive with a cigarette in their mouth that doesn’t know that they are bad for them. They smoke them because they want to. What’s wrong with that? Sun tanning causes cancer, too. Why don’t state legislatures start mandating that everyone wear long sleeve shirts during daylight hours? Is that absurd? Of course it is. So is the treatment of smokers.

    If you don’t want to listen to music with offensive lyrics, don’t. If you don’t want to go to a restaurant that allows smokers to enjoy themselves, don’t. I think that it can be far more obnoxious when someone gets completely hammered at a bar and begins causing problems, yet I’m not advocating outlawing alcohol.

    Business owners should have the choice to run their establishment the way they see fit. Smokers should have the choice to smoke their cigarettes if they choose to.

    Instead, people want to legislate personal health. If I enjoy cigarettes, that is my choice.

    To all those who advocate this kind of absurd legislation: I hope you look in the mirror when some group in the future comes after your vice of choice.

    JA | 2008-04-25 - 03:14:34 PM (CDT)
  4. jonathan spect is a truly brilliant journalist. keep up the good work.

    Joseph Pulitzer | 2008-04-26 - 12:17:01 AM (CDT)
  5. I agree with a lot of the comments here.

    There should be no resturant ban on smoking; it’s the resturant owner’s choice. It’s the employee’s choice to work there. It’s the customer’s choice to go in there. If they don’t want to be exposed to smoke, don’t go there.

    Moving the smoking age to 21 is also just a bad idea. America is slowly becoming less and less "Free" because of all the whiners out there who jump on wanting laws to make them feel better.

    Everyone knows smoking is bad for them but some still do it. Everyone knows being overweight is bad and I see way more overweight people than I do smokers. Let’s put restrictions on junk food and fast food. It’ll be good for your health.

    Jason B | 2008-04-29 - 10:39:10 PM (CDT)
Your Thoughts,
Name: (required)
To protect everyone from terrible spam, please enter the following code: (required)
captcha
* Offensive comments will be deleted!