Sign-In

STORY

Share

Women’s & Gender Studies reacts to NOW’s endorsement of Obama

[9 Comment(s)]

By Rachael Lundy

The National Organization of Women for Political Action Committee (NOW PAC) has recently endorsed Senator Barack Obama for president of the United States.

According to the Greater New Orleans NOW Web site, “The National Organization for Women is the largest organization of feminist activists in the United States whose goal is to bring about equality for all women.”

The National Organization of Women focuses on women’s issues such as women’s rights, pay equity, reproductive rights, violence against women and Supreme Court issues that typically lean to the left.

“Women of all ages, races and ethnicities are coming together in support of Senator Obama and his pledge to fulfill this country’s promise of equal opportunity for our daughters as well as our sons,” said NOW PAC Chair Kim Gandy on NOW’s Web site.

With Alaska Governor Sarah Palin now being the vice presidential candidate for Senator John McCain on the opposing side, one may question whether or not having a woman in the White House would affect NOW’s endorsement decision.

“There could be a woman in the White House, and the nation’s a-buzz over this rising star,” said Gandy on NOW’s Web site. “So why aren’t I more excited about this? Maybe because being a strong woman doesn’t necessarily make you strong on woman’s rights. Governor Palin is a mother of five who, like many women, balances being a mom and having a full-time job outside of the home. But feminism isn’t just about being a mom or a working woman or both – it’s just about believing every woman deserves an equal opportunity to utilize her strengths and control her destiny – that every woman deserves a level playing field and a fair chance to succeed.”

Michelle Massé, Director of Women’s and Gender Studies for LSU said, “Health, the war in Iraq, the economy, the environment and education, not necessarily in that order,” are issues that are important to her in the midst of this presidential campaign.

“Although women’s placement in the economy may make them particularly alert to certain issues, such as health care, these are all women’s issues,” said Massé. “We are looking at a system in which your wealth is becoming a determinant not just of how you live, but whether you go to war, whether you and your children can get the health care you need to survive, whether you can keep a roof over your head, and whether you can get an education. Because women are still paid less than men for comparable work, the impact of economic and policy inequity has dispropriate impact upon them and upon their children.”

As written on the LSU Women’s and Gender Studies Web site, this major “is an Interdisciplinary Program that examines the multiple roles gender plays in everyday life, the impacts of gender practices on social, cultural, and political behavior and thought, and the intersections of gender, race, sexuality and class. Our courses examine topics such as women in culture and history; gender and race, class, and sexuality; gender in literature, politics, the law, and the sciences.”

Because of the focus this area of study has on women in politics, one may think that having a woman in the White House may appeal to this group as well.

“Feminism is a social and political stance,” said Massé. “Many men are feminists; some women are not. Most WGS representatives will vote for the candidate who best represents equity, foresight and analytic ability.

There are individuals who have spoken of voting for the McCain-Palin ticket strictly for the reason of placing a woman in the White House.

“I keep hearing about these women, but I have yet to meet one,” said Massé. “Having a woman in the White House just because she’s a woman will in no way better the lot of women. In addition, a strategy that assumes women will vote for any woman is extraordinarily condescending because of its implicit suggestion that women don’t analyze issues but instead respond emotionally.”

The presidential campaign is nearing its close and women’s groups all over are going public with their political endorsements attempting to persuade others who, like them, feel that their issues are the most important issues for this presidential election.

Originally Published: Issue 707 - October 1, 2008

Share on Facebook
Back to the top

Comments

  1. Obama is a resident of the U.S. already

    Basia Christ | 2008-10-01 - 03:19:03 PM (CDT)
  2. Do You Want Justice, or Do You Want Corruption Working To Empower You?

    Senator Joe Biden proudly proclaims that he was beaten with impunity by his sister as a youth. This is the same sister that raised his two sons after his wife and daughter were killed in an auto accident.

    Biden has often claimed that the Violence against Women Act is the greatest achievement of his career. Yet he fails to recognize the role women play as perpetrators of violence against men and children. Hundreds of studies show that women commit acts of domestic violence as often as, or more often than men. Many studies show that lesbian women physically attack their intimate partners at least as often as heterosexual men. It’s also a well established fact that a child is more likely to be killed by the mother than by the father, a neighbor, an acquaintance, a stranger or a sex offender.

    As a result of Biden’s Violence against Women Act, the federal government pays states to create laws effectively requiring that innocent men be removed from their homes and families without even an allegation of violence, with no legitimate standards of evidence, when a woman makes a claim that she is afraid.

    Elaine Epstein, president of the Massachusetts Bar Association (1999), has said "the facts have become irrelevant... restraining orders are granted to virtually all who apply. Regarding divorce cases, she states "allegations of abuse are now used for tactical advantage". According to Epstein, who is also a former president of the Massachusetts Women’s Bar Association, restraining orders are doled out "like candy" and "in virtually all cases, no notice, meaningful hearing, or impartial weighing of evidence is to be had."

    State restraining order laws are starting to fall because they’re unconstitutional. The federal law behind them, written by Joe Biden, is likely to fall as well, not because it isn’t popular, but because it is clearly unconstitutional.

    There is a rapidly growing activist community dedicated to addressing this issue. One of the focal points of this community is the Glenn Sacks blog, www.glennsacks.com .

    Supporting Documentation

    Here are some of the facts regarding Biden’s abuse at the hand of his sister. During senate hearings held on December 11, 1990, Biden testified to the abuse.

    http://www.ifeminists.net/introduction/editorials/2006/0503roberts.html

    Senate Hearing Transcript:
    (see p. 171-172)

    http://thenononsenseman.com/Media/BidenViolenceSenateHearing_1990.pdf

    This recent CDC study indicates that women between the ages of 18 and 28 initiate reciprocal violence against their intimate partners about as often as men. It also indicates that women initiate non-reciprocal violence against their intimate partners more than twice as often as men.

    http://pn.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/42/15/31-a

    Here is a link to a bibliography of over 200 studies indicating that women are as violent as men in their intimate relationships:

    www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm

    According to the US Department of Justice, women also abuse, neglect and kill their children at significantly higher rates than men. Here’s some of the data on child homicides.

    http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm04/figure4_2.htm

    Research clearly indicates that lesbian battery is at least as common as heterosexual battery.

    http://www.glennsacks.com/domestic_violence_a_2.htm

    http://www.musc.edu/vawprevention/lesbianrx/factsheet.shtml

    http://lesbianlife.about.com/od/lesbianhealth/a/DVFactsMyths.htm

    Cathy Young reports on the Elaine Epstein quote and the broader issue at Salon.com here:

    http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/1999/10/25/restraining_orders/

    and provides in depth analysis here:

    http://www.iwf.org/files/50c58dda09f16c86b2c652aa047944f6.pdf

    HumanRights101 | 2008-10-01 - 03:32:57 PM (CDT)
  3. The National Organization of Women?

    every woman deserves an equal opportunity to utilize her strengths and control her destiny... WTF? Isn’t this what palin is doing???

    women don’t analyze issues but instead respond emotionally...? Isn’t this what they are doing?

    NOW dose not stand for woman, thay stand for progressives only! They make me sick to my stomach.

    Kirby | 2008-10-01 - 03:35:03 PM (CDT)
  4. What happens to "you go girl" when the going is corrupt?

    New Jersey’s domestic violence statute has recently been found unconstitutional. The New Jersey Attorney General is taking this case to the state’s Supreme Court.

    The New Jersey Law Journal reports that Judge Richard Russell of Ocean City made the following remarks on tape during a judicial training session regarding the issuance of restraining orders.

    source: http://www.fathersandhusbands.org/NJ_Rights_1.pdf

    “If I had one message to give you today, it is that your job is not to weigh the parties’ rights as you might be inclined to do as having been private practitioners. Your job is not to become concerned about all the constitutional rights of the man that you’re violating as you grant a restraining order. Throw him out on the street, give him the clothes on his back and tell him, ‘See ya’ around.’ “

    A new municipal judge attending the training session stated “The statute says we should apply just cause in issuing the order.” “You seem to be saying to grant every order.” Russell quickly replied, “Yeah, that’s what I seem to be saying.”

    The article is full of comments from Russell and his colleagues that are equally inflammatory.

    Perhaps you think Russell should have been disbarred for instructing judges to ignore the constitution. In doing so, he violated his greatest responsibility as a judge in the most blatant way possible. Perhaps you think he should have gone to prison.

    Russell now serves on the New Jersey Supreme Court’s State Domestic Violence Working Group, the Executive Committee of the State Bar’s Family Law Section, and the New Jersey Supreme Court’s Family Practice Committee. He currently is the chair of the court’s Child Support Subcommittee.

    Given a recent ruling declaring New Jersey’s domestic violence statute unconstitutional and given the imminent Supreme Court challenge, the truth regarding the real practices that are being used to separate men from their children and their homes must be heard.

    HumanRights101 | 2008-10-01 - 03:36:24 PM (CDT)
  5. Good job copying and pasting your pre-fab arguments everybody! Changing the world one comment board at a time.

    Jeff | 2008-10-01 - 03:46:34 PM (CDT)
  6. That’s how it’s done!

    HumanRights101 | 2008-10-01 - 05:26:54 PM (CDT)
  7. Women’s and Gender departments are silly...but Sarah Palin is far more serious. Can anyone tell me with a straight face that she is ready to be president? Yes, I said President. Because the first job of the VP is to be ready to be president. And John McCain is a 72 year old cancer survivor.

    Bob | 2008-10-01 - 11:32:16 PM (CDT)
  8. After 30 years in the employment business, Palin’s performance in her "interviews’ has knocked her out as a candidate. She does not know the answers to questions required to run the federal government, she cannot come up with examples when asked, she does not read and keep up on trends and recent events in the world....it is SOP in an interview to expect the candidate to have rich examples of knowledge and experience.

    Can you imagine a candidate in an interview saying, "I’ll get back to you on that"?

    Couric gave her a chance for a "second" interview; in corporate America, that would not have happened.

    awakenedcitizen | 2008-10-02 - 04:41:38 PM (CDT)
  9. Barack just needs to sit back knowing that women will not vote for another woman for a President of VP position. Many studies show that women will not vote for a woman because they are jealous by nature of other women that are in power. Women do not believe other women can handle such a difficult position. Kind of crazy how when women look back at what is holding them back in society it is themselves!

    PityTheFool | 2008-10-22 - 10:56:23 PM (CDT)
Your Thoughts,
Name: (required)
To protect everyone from terrible spam, please enter the following code: (required)
captcha
* Offensive comments will be deleted!